Law You Should Know
0/11 sections visited
Section 5

Civil Rights & Civil Liberties

Freedom from improper government action, and the right to be treated equally.

People use these two phrases interchangeably, but they point at different ideas. Civil liberties are protections from government, speech, religion, privacy, freedom from unreasonable searches. Civil rights are protections of equal treatment, the right not to be discriminated against because of who you are.

1

The Bill of Rights

The first ten amendments, ratified in 1791, list specific limits on federal power. The ones you are most likely to encounter:

  • First: speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition.
  • Second: the right to keep and bear arms.
  • Fourth: no unreasonable searches and seizures.
  • Fifth: due process, no self-incrimination, no double jeopardy.
  • Sixth: counsel, a speedy public trial, an impartial jury.
  • Eighth: no excessive bail or fines, no cruel and unusual punishment.

Originally these limited only the federal government. Through the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court has applied most of them to state and local governments too, a process called incorporation. That is why your city police are bound by the Fourth Amendment.

Real-life example

Campus police at a public university are government actors. The Bill of Rights applies to them in a way it does not apply to a private mall's security guards.
2

Due process

Due process has two sides. Procedural due process is about fair steps: notice of what you are accused of, a chance to be heard, and a neutral decision maker before the government takes your liberty or property. Substantive due process protects certain fundamental liberties from government interference regardless of the procedure used.

Real-life example

A public university cannot expel you for an alleged code violation without telling you the charge and giving you a real opportunity to respond. How formal that process must be depends on how serious the penalty is.
3

Equal protection

The Fourteenth Amendment requires states to give every person the equal protection of the laws. Courts do not treat every distinction the same way:

  • Strict scrutiny for race, national origin, and fundamental rights: the law must be narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest. Most laws fail this test.
  • Intermediate scrutiny for sex-based classifications: the law must be substantially related to an important government interest.
  • Rational basis for most other classifications, including age and economic regulation: the law only needs a legitimate purpose and a rational connection to it.

Congress has also passed civil rights statutes that reach private conduct the Constitution does not, such as bans on discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations.

Real-life example

A state law setting a minimum age for a driver's license only needs a rational reason, and safety is obviously rational. A law that treated applicants differently based on race would face strict scrutiny and almost certainly fall.
4

Privacy

The word "privacy" does not appear in the Constitution, but the Supreme Court has recognized privacy interests drawn from several amendments. Separately, statutes protect specific kinds of information , student education records, medical records, and financial data, and state laws add their own protections for things like biometric data and data breach notice.

Real-life example

Your grades are protected education records at a school that receives federal funding. Your university generally cannot hand them to an outside party without your consent.
5

Protection from unreasonable searches

The Fourth Amendment bars unreasonable searches and seizures and generally requires a warrant supported by probable cause. There are well-known exceptions: consent, items in plain view, searches incident to a lawful arrest, and emergencies. Evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search can often be excluded from trial.

Two practical points for students: you can decline to consent to a search, and giving consent waives the warrant requirement for that search.

Real-life example

An officer asks to look through your backpack during a stop. Saying "I do not consent to a search" is not an admission of anything, it preserves your rights. Opening the bag voluntarily gives consent.

Why This Matters

These rules decide what happens during a traffic stop, whether your school can search your dorm room, and whether a landlord or employer can treat you differently because of who you are. Civil liberties only protect you if you know what they cover, and knowing that you can decline a search, or that your phone generally needs a warrant, is genuinely useful information.

Did You Know?

In Riley v. California, the Court noted that modern cell phones hold a digital record of nearly every aspect of a person's life, which is why searching one is treated very differently from emptying someone's pockets.

Check your understanding: Civil Rights & Civil Liberties

Score: 0 / 3

  1. 1. Which is a civil liberty rather than a civil right?

  2. 2. Police want to look through the contents of your phone after arresting you. Under Riley v. California, they generally need:

  3. 3. A law that classifies people by race is reviewed under:

Sources for this page

See the full Works Cited page →